Monday, August 28, 2017

Skimming (Theft of Cash) in Nonprofits

















Significant Fraud Schemes in Nonprofits
  1. Skimming
When an entity receives cash, it must record (recognize) it in its accounting system. Skimming occurs when an employee steals cash or checks BEFORE recording it in the entity’s accounting system. Skimming schemes are usually called “off-books” schemes. Because cash theft happens before cash is recorded in the accounting records, it is tough to detect such a scheme: there is no audit trail.  

For example, when a cashier of a supermarket receives cash from a customer, does not issue a cash sales invoice, and pocket the money into his wallet, we call this skimming. When a nonprofit volunteer collects a donation from a donor where she did not issue him a cash receipt and pocketed the donated money for personal use, we call this skimming. 

“A recent case illustrates the ease with which funds can be skimmed when both of these characteristics are present. The president of an organization personally solicited and collected contributions from donors. He skimmed more than $4 million of contribution income over a 15-year period before being detected. He was only detected once his successor solicited one of the donors who had contributed, under the impression that the individual had never made a contribution to the organization. When the donor indicated he had been a significant supporter of the organization for several years, the fraud was then uncovered.”

Who may commit skimming schemes? Any employee who receives cash or checks from donors may skim funds. Therefore, cashiers, employees receiving payments/donations through the mail, or volunteers who collect funds from remote locations are a great skimming risk.

Therefore, nonprofit management should focus on preventing and deterring skimming schemes as detection is difficult. A proper design and implementation of specific internal control processes for cash receipts would significantly help lower skimming schemes risks. For example, a deficiency in any of the following controls would constitute a “red flag” that management should handle in a special care and professional skepticism. 
  • The employee who opens the mail should be independent of the cashier and accounts receivable staff.
  • Unopened business mail should be kept away from employees having access to accounting records. 
  • The employee who receives mail should
    • Stamp (“For Deposit Only”) on all checks received?
    • Prepare a list of the money, checks, and other receipts? 
    • Forward all remittances to the person responsible for preparing and making the daily bank deposit?
    • Forward the total of all remittances to the person responsible for comparing it to the authenticated deposit ticket and amount recorded?
       
  • Cash receipts should be prenumbered and independently be checked daily and reconciled with cash collections.
  • Nonprofit should bond employees or volunteers handing cash. 
The following schemes and topics are discussed thoroughly in Part 2: Corruption Prevention, Deterrence, and Detection - Nonprofit Organizations.
  1. Check Tampering
  2. Expense Reimbursements
  3. Payroll Schemes
Fraud and Corruption Risk Assessment 

The Minimum a Nonprofit Can Do to Prevent and Deter Fraud and Corruption

Download the associated PDF document.

Check more free resources at the Anti-Corruption Library


###END###

Saturday, August 19, 2017

The AACI to start teaching sixth Royal Discussion Paper



Amman, August 8 (Petra) — The American Anti-Corruption Institute (AACI) will be teaching the content of His Majesty King Abdullah II’s sixth Royal Discussion Paper: “Rule of Law and Civil State” at the universities which the AACI cooperates with globally, said Mike Masoud, senior director of The AACI in the Middle East and Africa.

He told Petra, on the sideline of Bright Jordan company delivering its Anti-Corruption certificate, that AACI considers the sixth Royal Discussion Paper as a primary anti-corruption resource in developing countries.

This Discussion Paper is a prerequisite to any effective national anti-corruption strategy”, he added. Masoud stated that awarding this certificate for a local Jordanian company working in the healthcare sector is considered a precedent in the Middle East in terms of implementation of anti-corruption and transparency measures. He added that Bright Jordan is an international pioneer in the field of medical protection and preservation of medical tourists’ and patients’ rights.

CEO and founder of Bright Jordan, Amid Sabri, said that Bright Jordan certification by the AACI as the first in the Middle East and North Africa region reaffirms the company’s commitment to the ethical and transparency standards within healthcare services.

He added that the core foundation of this certification is built on the principle of financial and operational transparency. Bright Jordan does not receive any fees or commissions from healthcare providers. This is essential to preserve the integrity of our professional role as a healthcare consultant providing total medical protection and achieving best results within minimum costs.

Sabri confirmed that such certification has a positive impact on the Jordanian economy through boosting trust in the local healthcare industry and promoting Jordan as a unique destination for medical tourism.

The sixth Discussion Paper was based on several principals among which: The rule of law is a foundation for effective management and eliminating nepotism or “Wasta” as the core of the civil state.


8/8/2017–04:03:01 PM

Cost of Corruption



Corruption cost is, at least, 5% of revenues or GDP. It adds to costs of service & products. It's higher in developing countries.